Showing posts with label Option F: Food and health. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Option F: Food and health. Show all posts

Thursday, January 24, 2019

F4. Future health and food security and sustainability

Possible solutions to food insecurity

Economic solution


Management solution


Technological solution


Advantages and disadvantages of contemporary approaches to food production 

The green revolution

The Green Revolution: Waging A War Against Hunger

The Mythology of the Green Revolution

GMOs

List of Advantages of Genetically Modified Foods

1. Insect Resistance
Some GMO foods have been modified to make them more resistant to insects and other pests. A report from the University of California in San Diego states that toxic bacteria (yet safe for human use) can be added to crops to make them repel insects. This means the amount of pesticide chemicals used on the plants are reduced, so their exposure to dangerous pesticides are also reduced.

2. Stronger Crops
Another benefit that GM technology is believed to bring about is that crops can be engineered to withstand weather extremes and fluctuations, which means that there will be good quality and sufficient yields even under a poor or severe weather condition. As populations across the world grow and more lands are being utilized for housing instead of food production, farmers are prompted to grow crops in locations that are originally not suitable for plant cultivation, and culturing plants that can withstand high salt content in soil and groundwater, not to mention long periods of drought, will help them grow healthy crops. Also, animals and plants that have been genetically modified can become more resistant to unexpected disease problems. We can just think of the technology as a vaccine for the species, except that it is encoded into their genes, rather than being shot into their immune system.

3. Larger Production
It has been easier to raise crops that are classified as genetically modified because all of their examples have the stronger ability to resist pests. This attribute helps farmers with producing greater amounts of crops or foods.

4. Environmental Protection
According to an Oklahoma State University report, the increase of GM animals and crops often requires less time, tools and chemicals, and may help with reducing greenhouse gas emissions, soil erosion and environmental pollution. This means the general health and beauty of the environment that surrounds farms will be improved, contributing to the preservation of better water and air quality, which can also indirectly benefit every person’s well-being.

5. Extensive Protection for Crops
GM foods were created with the use of genetic engineering—a technology that was designed to make sure crops will never be damaged in a fast rate. The method also allows farmers and merchants to preserve the good quality of foods more efficiently by using special substances.

6. More Nutritious Foods
According to the Food and Agricultural Organization of the United Nations, some GM foods have been engineered to become more nutritious in terms of vitamin or mineral content. This not only helps people get the nutrients they need, but also plays a significant role in fighting against malnutrition in third-world countries. In fact, the United Nations recommends that rice that is enhanced with vitamin A can help with reducing deficiencies of such nutrient around the world.

7. Decreased Use of Pesticides
It has been proven that genetically modified crops do not need pesticides to become stronger against various types of insects or pests that may destroy them.

8. More Income
With genetic engineering, farmers will have more income, which they could spend on important things, such as the education of their children for example.

9. Less Deforestation
To sufficiently feed the growing population of the world, deforestation is needed. But with genetically modified animals and crops, the use of this method will be minimized. This would decrease carbon dioxide in the atmosphere, which would, in turn, slow global warming.

10. Decrease in Global Warming
As more plants and crops can be grown and at more areas, including those that were previously unsuitable for farming, oxygen in the environment is increased, decreasing the proportion of carbon dioxide and, in turn, reducing global warming. In fact, British economists noted in a study that genetically modified crops have made significant contribution to reducing greenhouse gas emissions by over 10 million tons, which is equivalent to removing 5 million cars from the road each year. This means that people would not have to give up their vehicles.

11. Decrease in Food Prices
Due to higher yield and lower costs, food prices would go down. As people in poorer countries spend over half of their income on food alone, this means automatic reduction of poverty.

12. New Products
New kinds of crops are being developed to be grown at extreme climates, such as those present in dry or freezing environments. As an example, scientists have developed a new type of tomato that grows in salty soil. Another good discovery in genetic engineering of plants is the exclusion of the gene responsible for caffeine in coffee beans, creating decaffeinated coffee beans, which can then be grown naturally.

List of Disadvantages of Genetically Modified Foods

1. Allergic Reactions
According to research by the Brown University, resent genetically modified foods can pose significant allergy risks to people. It states that genetic modification often adds or mixes proteins that were not indigenous to the original animal or plant, which might cause new allergic reactions in our body. In some cases, proteins from organisms that you are allergic to might be added to organisms that you were not originally allergic to. This means your range of food choices will be lessened.

2. Not 100% Environmentally Friendly
Though it is claimed by many experts that genetically modified foods are safe for the environment, they actually still contain several kinds of substances that are not yet proven to be such. And what’s worse? These substances are remained hidden to the public.

3. Lower Level of Biodiversity
One big potential drawback of this technology is that some organisms in the ecosystem could be harmed, which in turn could lead to a lower level of biodiversity. When we remove a certain pest that is harmful to crops, we could also be removing a food source for a certain species. In addition, genetically modified crops could prove toxic to some organisms, which can lead to their reduced numbers or even extinction.

4. Decreased Antibiotic Efficacy
According to the Iowa State University, some genetically modified foods have antibiotic features that are built into them, making them resistant or immune to viruses or diseases or viruses. And when we eat them, these antibiotic markers will persist in our body and will render actual antibiotic medications less effective. The university also warns that ingestion of these foods and regular exposure to antibiotics may contribute to the reduced effectiveness of antibiotic drugs, as noticed in hospitals across the planet.

5. Unusual Taste
Genetically modified foods are observed to have unnatural tastes compared with the ordinary foods that are sold on the market. This could be the result of the substances that were added to their composition.

6. Not Totally Safe to Eat
It is proven by scientific studies that GMO foods contain substances that may cause diseases and even death to several kinds of species in this world, including us humans. For instance, mice and butterflies cannot survive with these foods.

7. Cross-Pollination
Cross-pollination can cover quite large distances, where new genes can be included in the offspring of organic, traditional plants or crops that are miles away. This can result in difficulty in distinguishing which crop fields are organic and which are not, posing a problem to the task of properly labeling non-GMO food products.

8. Gene Spilling
It is unclear what effects, if there are any, the genetic pollution resulting from inadequate sequestering of genetically modified crop populations would have on the wild varieties surrounding them. However, it is stressed that releasing pollen from genetically altered plants into the wild through the insects and the wind could have dramatic effects on the ecosystem, though there is yet long-term research to be done to gauge such impact.

9. Gene Transfer
Relevant to the previous disadvantage, a constant risk of genetically modified foods is that an organism’s modified genes may escape into the wild. Experts warn that genes from commercial crops that are resistant to herbicides may cross into the wild weed population, thus creating super-weeds that have become impossible to kill. For genetically enhanced vegetation and animals, they may become super-organisms that can out-compete natural plants and animals, driving them into extinction.

10. Conflicts
GMO foods can cause a lot of issues in the merchants’ daily life. How? These products might encourage authorities to implement higher tariffs to merchants, who would be selling them.

11. Exploitations
Some countries may use genetic engineering of foods as a very powerful weapon against their enemies. It is important to note that some scientists have discovered that these products can kill a lot of individuals in the world by using harmful diseases.

12. Widening Gap of Corporate Sizes
This disadvantage can possibly happen between food-producing giants and their smaller counterparts, causing a consolidation in the market. There would be fewer competitors, which could increase the risk of oligopolies and food price increases. Moreover, larger companies might have more political power and might be able to influence safety and health standards.

13. New Diseases
As previously mentioned, genetically modified foods can create new diseases. Considering that they are modified using viruses and bacteria, there is a fear that this will certainly happen. This threat to human health is a worrisome aspect that has received a great deal of debate.

14. Food Supply at Risk
GMO seeds are patented products and, in order to purchase them, customers have to sign certain agreements for use with the supplier or creator. As the reliance on these seeds expands around the world, concerns about food supply and safety also continue to arise. Furthermore, these seeds structurally identical, and if a problem affects one of them, a major crop failure can occur.

15. Economic Concerns
Bringing a genetically modified food to market can be a costly and lengthy process, and of course, agricultural bio-technology companies want to ensure a profitable ROI. So, many new plant genetic engineering technologies and products have been patented, and patent infringement is a big concern within the agribusiness. Also, consumer advocates are worried that this will raise seed prices to very high levels that third-world countries and small farmers cannot afford them, thus widening the gap between the rich and the poor.

Vertical farming

PROS: THE OPPORTUNITIES, BENEFITS, AND ADVANTAGES OF VERTICAL FARMING

1. Improves Production Output and Maximizes Land Use
A remarkable opportunity from or advantage of vertical farming over traditional field agriculture is that it can help increase agricultural outputs by maximizing the use of lands. The study of Chirantan Banerjee and Lucie Adenaeur revealed that a 37-storey building standing on a 0.25 hectare of land was able to produce 3500 tons of different fruits and vegetables. Take note that field farming within a similar land area would not be able to produce as much.

The review study Kurt Benke and Bruce Tomkins also mentioned that vertical farming could address the issue concerning the declining farmlands across the world due to the reduction of fresh water supply and the effects of climate change.

2. Protects the Environment through Resource Conservation
Vertical farming also aims to address environmental issues associated with the use of limited natural resources and land areas. Because this practice involves maximizing the use of a limited land area, it can eliminate deforestation and desertification due to agricultural encroachment. It also eliminates farming practices that lead to soil erosion and nutrient runoff.

Furthermore, vertical farming involves a closed-cycle design that maximizes the use of resources such as energy and fertilizers while minimizing losses due to runoff and leeching that are associated with field farming.

3. Merges Food Production and Consumption in One Place
Another benefit of vertical farming is that it shortens the entire farm-to-market process by enabling urban farming. A review study by Kheir Al-Kodmany noted that cities need to produce food internally to respond to demand from growing population, avoid price shocks, and address environmental issues concerning field farming.

Vertical farming tackles the issues mentioned above. This benefit translates further to more specific opportunities and benefits such as the promotion of sustainable or self-sufficient cities, encouragement of urban growth, and the delivery of fresh and inexpensive food products.

4. Supports Diverse Crops through an Adaptable System
Vertical farming depends on the effective and efficient use of different technologies and practices such as hydroponic systems, aeroponics, aquaponics, greenhouse design, environmental control, and energy sustainability to collectively implement a controlled-environment agriculture or CEA technology. This technology can maintain the optimal growing conditions of agricultural produces and even animal-based food products.

In addition, because a vertical farm can control different environmental variables such as temperature, humidity, light, and nutrient distribution through CES technology, it can essentially support the cultivation of different types of crops that are sensitive and dependent to weather or other environmental preconditions.

5. Promotes the Efficient and Sustainable Use of Energy
Another advantage of vertical farming is that it can be aligned with renewable and alternative energy technologies. A facility can take advantage of photovoltaic solar panels to store and generate needed electricity for running its CES technology. It can also exploit methane digesters to produce energy, particularly by building an on-site capability for transforming organic waste into biogas. The biogas can fire up fuel-based electricity generators.

Note that there are ongoing studies and tests centered on generating electricity or producing fuels using natural and engineered plants, and cultured bacteria. In other words, given the right use of current technologies or the future availability of more advanced technologies, a vertical farm can work off-the-grid and be self-sufficient.

6. Generates Multidisciplinary High-Skilled Jobs
There is also an opportunity or benefit centered on the creation of different types of jobs from different fields or disciplines. Promoting vertical farming means promoting high-tech green industry. It would lead to the generation of new careers for professionals in the fields of civil engineering and agriculture, information technology, project management, business and management, and marketing and retail, among others.

A new breed of farmers with relevant skills or knowledge would also be needed to manage planting, cultivation, monitoring, and harvesting. Demand for experts in the different subfields of science such as agricultural science, biotechnology, bioengineering and genetics, plant pathology, and horticulture, among others could also increase.

CONS: THE CHALLENGES, LIMITATIONS, AND DISADVANTAGES OF VERTICAL FARMING

1. Issues Regarding Economic Viability Due to Costs
Different concerns regarding economic feasibility collectively comprise one of the notable limitations or disadvantages of vertical farming. For example, Banerjee and Adenaeur noted that the 37-stored vertical farm on a quarter-hectare of land they investigated had an investment cost of more than USD 220 million. Note that this modern type of farm depends heavily on modern engineering and architecture, as well as the application of different technologies.

There is also a challenge over costs and competition for commercial spaces in cities. Building vertical farms in expensive cities can add to the total investment and operational costs. Furthermore, endorsing the building of vertical farms could also increase occupancy cost and real estate value due to additional demand.

2. Possible Environmental and Energy Implications
There are also concerns over pollution and sustainable use. Crops grown indoors depend on artificial light. Note that sunlight can be exploited for natural lighting or self-sufficient generation of electricity through photovoltaic solar panels. The use of light-emitting diode or LED lamps also drives down the cost of electricity consumption. Of course, other than artificial lighting, a vertical farm includes complex machinery and automated systems. Hence, when compared to field farming, vertical farming has an additional energy input.

While renewable and alternative sources of energy can promote the ecological soundness of vertical farming, the practice can still have a considerable carbon footprint if it still depends on the use of fossil fuels. There is a need to improve first renewable and alternative energy technologies to guarantee environmental sustainability and energy efficiency of vertical farming.

3. Likely Disruption to the Rural Sector and its Communities
Another foreseen challenge and disadvantage of vertical farming involves the potential for disrupting the rural sector, especially those communities with economies that are dependent on agriculture. Vertical farms can render traditional farming jobs obsolete. Farmers who do not have competencies in vertical farming would be left jobless. Communities dependent on agriculture would certainly suffer.

Essentially, urban farming would compete with rural farming. The review study of Benke and Tomkins noted that to transition to vertical farming effectively, there is a need to devise and implement strategies or plans intended to educate government officials, create relevant laws or policies, and familiarize farmers to new trends in agriculture.

4. Requires Advance Technologies and Complex Processes
Aligned to the high startup cost of building and operating a vertical farm, another possible disadvantage is the need to apply various technologies and design complex processes. Vertical farming is more complicated to initiate and maintain than traditional field agriculture.

For example, automation through information technology and information systems in vertical farming are essential for maintaining and adjusting appropriate climate conditions without the need for regular human intervention. IT-related technology will also be helpful for monitoring crops, crop maintenance, recording outputs, and determining demands. Nevertheless, it would be challenging to build and operate a vertical farm for someone who does not have relevant familiarity, connection, and capital.

In-vitro meat

Pros

Space
The Daily Express reports that in the UK, 85% of the total land footprint “is associated with animal products, with the land footprint of commercial lab-grown meat being 99% lower than for normal animal husbandry”.

“We can produce the same amount of meat in factories on 1% of the land it presently takes us to do it,” Prie said.

Sustainability
In America, consumers eat 26 billion pounds (13 million tons) of beef each year, which Wired says “demands a massive industrialized livestock system that is problematic for the planet”.

Worldwide, livestock “may be responsible for 15% of greenhouse gas emissions”, the magazine adds, and switching to lab-grown meat would reduce these emissions by up to 96%.

As such, it has been touted as a possible solution to global warming and climate change, and should theoretically lead to a reduction in deforestation for livestock purposes. Prie adds: “It's sustainable, environmentally friendly, we don't have to cut down rainforests to plant crops to feed animals if you're growing it in factories.”

Animal welfare
The system of farm-based meat production “rarely has the animals’ best interests in mind”, Wired says, and animal welfare in meat-producing farms and factories has long been a source of controversy worldwide.

Lab-grown meat, meanwhile, could be “environmentally and animal-welfare friendly, ethical, and less likely to carry diseases”, The Conversation suggests.

“It could increase the proportion of happy animals on Earth if it replaced intensive farm animal production. By happy, we mean well nourished, comfortable, healthy, free from pain, and able to perform.”

Health benefits
“Doing away with slaughterhouses could reduce the risk of food-borne illnesses, as well as diseases transmitted between live animals and humans,” Faunalytics says.

“In addition, lab-grown meat could easily supplemented with vitamins and minerals that are not found in natural meat.”

Cons

Trust
In a survey undertaken by The Conversation, the site found that people often have a “perception that [lab-grown meat] is unnatural”, which “may be similar to people’s concerns about genetically modified (GM) foods – some of those who oppose GM foods are moral absolutists who would not be influenced by any argument in favor”.

Job losses
Many farming bodies are “understandably against this potential threat to their livelihood - and there's some way to go to convincing some food lovers we spoke to,” Sky News says.

“There’s a very real danger that those at the bottom of the business pyramid find themselves excluded from the marketplace, if the world does embrace new, more 'ethical' meat products,” Twisted says. “Balancing the need for development in our farming practices with maintaining peoples’ livelihoods promises to be a difficult tightrope to walk over the coming years.”

Taste
Lab-grown meat could theoretically contain no fat, and would also contain no bones, which may compromise the taste to some consumers, Future For All suggests.

However, at present, little is known about the potential flavors of lab-grown meat compared to livestock-based products.

Obesity
If lab-grown meat proves to be cheaper and easier to mass-produce than traditional meat, “researchers believe it could encourage over-consumption, which could, in turn, increase obesity and related issues”, Faunalytics says.


The merits of prevention and treatment in managing disease


Managing pandemics



Synthesis, evaluation and skills

Use the content from this post to answer the following question: 

‘Discuss how patterns in health and the diffusion of disease can be represented graphically’. 10 marks. 

Use mark scheme on page 56 from the new syllabus guide (AO3).

F3. Stakeholders in food and health

The roles of international organizations, governments and NGOs in combating food insecurity and disease

FAO


Aims:

WHO

Image result for who


What we do

We are the directing and coordinating authority on international health within the United Nations’ system.
We do this by:

  • providing leadership on matters critical to health and engaging in partnerships where joint action is needed;
  • shaping the research agenda and stimulating the generation, translation and dissemination of valuable knowledge;
  • setting norms and standards and promoting and monitoring their implementation;
  • articulating ethical and evidence-based policy options;
  • providing technical support, catalyzing change, and building sustainable institutional capacity; and
  • monitoring the health situation and assessing health trends.
These are the areas in which we work
  • Health systems
  • Noncommunicable diseases
  • Promoting health through the life-course
  • Communicable diseases
  • Preparedness, surveillance and response
  • Corporate services

Read more about the WHO from their brochure.

Governments and the role of agricultural subsidies 

Image result for agricultural subsidies

Agriculture subsidies mean the financial assistance provided by government to farmers through government-sponsored price-support programs. The objective behind providing agriculture subsidies is to provide benefits to farmers and thereby stabilize food prices, ensure plentiful food production, and to guarantee basic income to farmers. In U.S. and France, agricultural subsidies are designed to increase farm income by raising the long-term level of prices above free-market levels or by providing direct payments to farmers. Agricultural subsidy helps to influence the cost and supply of commodities such as wheat, feed grains, cotton, milk, rice, peanuts, sugar, tobacco, and oilseeds such as soybeans.


Read more about agricultural subsidies from the article Are agricultural subsidies causing more harm than good?

MSF

Related image

Who we are

An international, independent medical humanitarian organisation

Médecins Sans Frontières (MSF) translates to Doctors without Borders. We provide medical assistance to people affected by conflict, epidemics, disasters, or exclusion from healthcare. Our teams are made up of tens of thousands of health professionals, logistic and administrative staff - bound together by our charter.  Our actions are guided by medical ethics and the principles of impartiality, independence and neutrality. We are a non-profit, self-governed, member-based organisation.

MSF was founded in 1971 in Paris by a group of journalists and doctors. Today, we are a worldwide movement of more than 42,000 people.



The influence of TNCs (agribusinesses and the media) in shaping food consumption habits

For much of human history, food production was seen as the job of the family or village. Towards the end of the 20th century, commercial farming in many parts of the world was transformed into a corporate enterprise as large companies purchased and merged small farms. The aim of the corporations involved in farming, commonly known as agribusiness, to achieve economies of scale by farming large areas of land using a high rate of mechanization to minimize labor needs in an effort to maximize profits. Some agribusiness are international in scale, in which case they are examples of TNCs (transnational corporations).

Source: Codrington, Stephen. Our Dynamic Planet. 2nd ed., Solid Star Press, 2016, p. 628.

Guess Which Big Food Companies Own Your Favorite Organic Products?
Source: https://www.onegreenplanet.org/news/guess-which-big-food-companies-own-your-favorite-organic-products/

The ongoing globalization, privatization, and deregulation of food systems and supplies may have relatively little impact on public health in high-income countries whose dietary patterns are already fully industrialized. But the displacement of traditional food systems in Africa, Asia, and Latin America (“the South”) by the fatty, sugary, or salty “long-life” ultra-processed products marketed by transnational food and drink corporations, which has been increasing rapidly since the 1980s, has the potential to undermine public health by increasing the incidence of chronic diseases and obesity.

Source: Monteiro, Carlos A. and Cannon, Geoffrey. The Impact of Transnational “Big Food” Companies on the South: A View from Brazil. https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3389019/

Screen Shot 2018 03 04 at 11.15.33 AM
Source: https://www.inc.com/business-insider/millennials-food-industry-preferences-eating-out-restaurant-prepared-meals-catering.html


Source: https://www.economist.com/special-report/2012/12/15/food-for-thought

Gender roles related to food and health, including food production/acquisition and disparities in health

Food security is defined as having four main components: availability, access, utilization, and stability. Women play key roles in maintaining all four pillars of food security: as food producers and agricultural entrepreneurs; "gatekeepers" who dedicate their own time, income and decision-making to maintain food and nutritional security of their households and communities; and "managers" of the stability of food supplies in times of economic hardship.

In many countries women supply most of the labour needed to produce food crops and often control the use and sale of food produce grown on plots they manage. However, the gender disparities in ownership of, access to, and control of livelihood assets (such as land, water, energy, credit, knowledge, and labour) negatively affect women's food production. For instance, compromised land access often means that women obtain lower yields than would otherwise be possible if household resources were allocated more equitably. Insecurity of tenure for women thus compromises their production potential and increases food insecurity. Greater food security would be achieved if women had access to needed assets and resources and had a voice in the decisions that have an impact on the lives of their households and communities.

A significant proportion of women work in informal non-agricultural sectors, such as trading and small-scale processing, which both contributes to the food value chain and generates income for them to purchase food. However, rural women often face constraints to market engagement due to factors such as lack of mobility, capacity, and technical skills. Likewise, women food crop entrepreneurs can play important economic roles that have positive effects beyond the micro level (e.g. supplying food products and employment opportunities), but are often hindered by discriminatory practices and stereotypical attitudes from accessing opportunities to expand their businesses. Improving women farmers' participation in marketing chains and entrepreneurial activities – e.g., by investment in transport and infrastructure, improved provision of training and information, or changes in policy and regulatory frameworks – would mean giving a boost to aggregate food security.


Closing the gap between men and women in agriculture


Cultivating equality in the food system | Danielle Nierenberg | TEDxManhattan

Factors affecting the severity of famine

Famines are extreme events in which large populations lack adequate access to food, leading to widespread malnutrition and deaths. More of these deaths are caused by infectious disease than starvation because severe malnutrition compromises human immune systems. This makes people much more susceptible to killer diseases such as measles, or even common conditions such as diarrhea. Young children are especially vulnerable.Experts now agree on three characteristics that define a famine:
  • At least 20 percent of households in a given group face extreme food deficits, with no ability to cope;
  • At least 30 percent of children in a given group are acutely malnourished, meaning that their weight is dangerously low compared to their height; and
  • Mortality rates exceed two people per 10,000 population per day. For comparison, a noncrisis rate in contemporary sub-Saharan Africa would be about 0.3.



Famine victims since 1860s march18

Famines by continent and me 01

Famines have always occurred as the result of a complex mix of ‘technical’ and ‘political’ factors, but the developments of the modern industrial era have generally reduced the salience of natural constraints in causing famine. This includes availability of food per person, made possible through increasing agricultural yields; improvements in healthcare and sanitation; increased trade; reduced food prices and food price volatility; as well as reductions in the number of people living in extreme poverty. Over time, famines have become increasingly “man-made”-phenomena, becoming more clearly attributable to political causes, including non-democratic government and conflict. Paradoxically, over the course of the 20th century famine was virtually eradicated from most of the world, whilst over the same period there occurred some of the worst famines in recorded history. This is because many of the major famines of the 20th century were the outcome of wars or totalitarian regimes. As such, the waning of the very high levels of warfare over the last decades (as seen in the reduced number of battle deaths in recent times) and the spread of democratic institutions has also played a large part in the substantial reduction in famine mortality witnessed in recent decades.



Case study - One case study of the issues affecting a famine-stricken country or area - African Sahel

preview
Source: https://reliefweb.int/map/nigeria/cadre-harmonis-analysis-projected-food-and-nutrition-situation-sahel-and-west-africa

Follow the links to read more about famine in the African Sahel:

Famines are becoming more frequent in the Sahel

U.N. calls for urgent aid to Sahel as hunger crisis looms

Synthesis, evaluation and skills


Use the content from this post to plan and another to answer the following question: 

‘Examine the different perspectives of stakeholders on the priorities for health care and food security’. 10 marks. 

Use mark scheme on page 56 from the new syllabus guide (AO3).


Thursday, August 23, 2018

F2. Food systems and spread of diseases

Comparing energy efficiency and water footprints in food production

Systems approach: water-food-energy nexus


The water, energy and food (WEF) nexus means that the three sectors — water security, energy security and food security — are inextricably linked and that actions in one area more often than not have impacts in one or both of the others.

FAO has developed an approach to assess and manage the water-energy-food nexus to inform decision-making processes and to guide the development of “Nexus-sensitive” policies, supporting countries in designing and implementing them in a participatory manner.

AS part of the WEF Nexus approach, the Nexus Assessment (including the Nexus Rapid Appraisal) consists of an easily applicable methodology, which relies on indicators that are based on different country typologies, allowing a quick assessment of possible interventions against overarching development goals such as food security, and the sustainability of the use and management of energy and water supplies.


Source: Nagle, G. and Cooke, B. Geography course companion. Oxford. 2nd edition

The physical and human processes that can lead to variations in food consumption

Josette Sheeran - Ending hunger now

FAO hunger map



Diffusion

The role of diffusion  in the spread of agricultural innovations 


Source: Nagle, G. and Cooke, B. Geography course companion. Oxford. 2nd edition

The role of diffusion  in the spread of diseases



Geographic factors contributing to the incidence, diffusion and impacts of vector-borne diseases 

Zika virus

Current Zika transmission - worldwide, 21 December 2017



Follow the links below for more information about the incidence, diffusion and impacts of the Zika virus:



Cholera

The Story of Cholera

Resultado de imagem para cholera map


Synthesis, evaluation and skills

Use the content from this post to plan an answer for the following exam style question: ‘Contrast the scale of causes and solutions to food and health problems’. 10 marks. 

Use mark scheme on page 56 from the new syllabus guide (AO3).



Thursday, August 2, 2018

F1. Measuring food and health

Global patterns in food/nutrition indicators

The food security index

The Global Food Security Index (GFSI), launched in June 2012, is based on a quantitative and
qualitative scoring model that measures levels of food security across 105 countries by addressing
the central issue of how consumers can easily access sufficient amounts of affordable, high-quality and safe food. 

The index considers the following core issues across a set of 105 countries, with each of the three categories being further divided into a series of indicators that evaluate programs, policies or practices that influence food security:

  • Affordability – Measures the ability of consumers to purchase food, their vulnerability to price shocks, and the presence of programs and policies to support consumers when shocks occur. The following indicators are used: food consumption as a proportion of total household expenditure; proportion of population living under or close to the global poverty line; gross domestic product per capita (at purchasing power parity exchange rates); agricultural import tariffs; presence of food safety net programs; and access to financing for farmers.
  • Availability – Measures the sufficiency of the national food supply, the risk of supply disruption, national capacity to disseminate food, and research efforts to expand agricultural output. The following indicators are used: sufficiency of supply; public expenditure on agricultural research and development; agricultural infrastructure; volatility of agricultural production; and political stability risk.
  • Quality – Measures the variety and nutritional quality of average diets, as well as the safety of food. The following indicators are used: diet diversification; government commitment to increasing nutritional standards; micronutrient availability; protein quality; and food safety.

Resultado de imagem para global food security index

Follow the link below to explore the interactive map:

The hunger index

The Global Hunger Index (GHI) is designed to comprehensively measure and track hunger globally and by country and region. Calculated each year by the International Food Policy Research Institute (IFPRI), the GHI highlights successes and failures in hunger reduction and provides insights into the drivers of hunger. By raising awareness and understanding of regional and country differences in hunger, the GHI aims to trigger actions to reduce hunger.



Follow the link below to explore the interactive map:

Calories per person/capita

Source: https://ourworldindata.org/food-per-person


Source: https://ourworldindata.org/food-per-person

Indicators of malnutrition

ï‚—Maganese: enzymic cofactor in SOD, oxidative
phosphorylation, bone mineralization.
ï‚—Deficiency: Growth retadation, wt. lo...

Pellagra

Pellagra is a disease caused by low levels of niacin, also known as vitamin B-3. It’s marked by dementia, diarrhea, and dermatitis, also known as “the three Ds”. If left untreated, pellagra can be fatal. 
While it’s much less common than it used to be, thanks to advancements in food production, it’s still a problem in many developing countries. It can also affect people whose bodies don’t properly absorb niacin.
Dermatitis related to pellagra usually causes a rash on the face, lips, feet, or hands. In some people, dermatitis forms around the neck, a symptom known as Casal necklace.
Resultado de imagem para what is pellagra Resultado de imagem para what is pellagra

Kwashiorkor

Kwashiorkor, also known as “edematous malnutrition” because of its association with edema (fluid retention), is a nutritional disorder most often seen in regions experiencing famine. It is a form of malnutrition caused by a lack of protein in the diet. People who have kwashiorkor typically have an extremely emaciated appearance in all body parts except their ankles, feet, and belly, which swell with fluid.


On Malnutrition: What is Kwashiorkor and Marasmus?

Marasmus

Marasmus is a form of severe malnutrition. It can occur in anyone who has severe malnutrition, but it usually occurs in children. It typically occurs in developing countries. Marasmus can be life-threatening, but you can get treatment for it.
The main symptom of marasmus is being underweight. Children with this condition have lost a lot of muscle mass and subcutaneous fat. Subcutaneous fat is the layer of fat just under the skin. Dry skin and brittle hair are also symptoms of marasmus.
In children with marasmus, the following can also occur:

  • chronic diarrhea
  • respiratory infections
  • intellectual disability
  • stunted growth
Seriously malnourished children may look older and have little to no energy or enthusiasm for anything. Marasmus can also make children short-tempered and irritable, but this is usually a more common symptom of kwashiorkor.


Obesity

Obesity is a disease that causes very serious health problems and unfortunately shortens the life span. For obesity classification, many parameters such as laboratory and imaging methods, body fat percentage and the type of fat deposition are used. For the moment, however, the World Health Organization (WHO) uses the body mass index (BMI) calculation for the identification and classification of obesity, and it is almost a common language all over the world. It is a value that everyone can calculate with a simple operation. Individuals with a BMI greater than 30 are considered obese.


Starvation, famine and hunger

Starvation is the result of a severe or total lack of nutrients needed for the maintenance of life. Adequate nutrition has two components, necessary nutrients and energy in the form of calories. It is possible to ingest enough energy without a well-balanced selection of individual nutrients and produce diseases that are noticeably different from those resulting from an overall insufficiency of nutrients and energy. Although all foods are a source of energy for the human body, it is possible to consume a seemingly adequate amount of food without getting the required minimum of energy (calories).

Dan Maxwell and Nisar Majid’s 2016 book Famine in Somalia has a good definition: “Famine is broadly understood as ‘an extreme crisis of access to adequate food, manifested in widespread malnutrition and loss of life due to starvation and infectious disease.’”
In technical terms, a famine is a situation where one in five households experience “an extreme lack of food and other basic needs where starvation, death, and destitution are evident.” More than 30 percent of people are “acutely malnourished” and two out of every 10,000 people die from starvation.

Hunger isn't just a stomach thing | World Vision US

The nutrition transition and the epidemiological transition models

Take a moment to recap the stages of the demographic transition model and some of the causes and consequences of the demographic changes it represents.

Now compare it to the nutrition transition model. 

We can also analyze the epidemiological transition model in comparison to the two previous models. 




Global patterns in health indicators

Health-adjusted life expectancy (HALE)

HALE is a measure of population health that takes into account mortality and morbidity. It adjusts overall life expectancy by the amount of time lived in less than perfect health. This is calculated by subtracting from the life expectancy a figure which is the number of years lived with disability multiplied by a weighting to represent the effect of the disability.

Follow the link below to access an interactive map and graph for HALE:

Infant and child mortality rates


  • Neonatal mortality (NNM): the probability of dying within the first month of life
  • Post-neonatal mortality (PNNM):the probability of dying between the first month and first birthday (the difference between infant and neonatal mortality)
  • Infant mortality: the probability of dying before the first birthday, or IMR
  • Child mortality : the probability of dying between the first and fifth birthday, or CMR
  • Under-five mortality: the probability of dying between birth and the fifth birthday, or U5MR

The child mortality rate measures the probability that a child will perish before he or she reaches the age of five, if subject to subject to age-specific mortality rates of a given year. It is obtained by dividing the number of deaths of children under the age of five by the total number of children of that same age times 1000(‰). 

Similarly, the infant mortality rate is obtained when dividing the total number of deaths of children under the age of one by the total amount of children in that same age rent in a given year times 1000(‰).  

Source: https://ourworldindata.org/child-mortality

Source: https://ourworldindata.org/child-mortality

Source: https://ourworldindata.org/child-mortality

Resultado de imagem para infant mortality 2015 map
Source: https://www.mapsofworld.com/thematic-maps/infant-mortality-rate-map.html

Maternal mortality 

Maternal death is the death of a woman while pregnant or within 42 days of termination of pregnancy, irrespective of the duration and site of the pregnancy, from any cause related to or aggravated by the pregnancy or its management but not from accidental or incidental causes.


Access to sanitation 

Resultado de imagem para sanitation map

The ratio between doctors/physicians and people


The diseases continuum

Source: Codrington, S. (2017). Planet geography - Themes. 2nd edition. Sydney: Solid Star Press.

Synthesis, evaluation and skills 

Use the content from this post to plan and answer the following exam style question: ‘Analyse the spatial interactions between geographies of health and food/nutrition’. 10 marks. 

Use mark scheme on page 56 from the new syllabus guide (AO3).